Using passive voice
![]() |
Forming passive voice clauses | page 1 of 1 |
Forming passive voice clauses
It is usual to describe the forms of passive clauses by comparing them
with related active clauses
:
Passive voice (original versions)
The decision was taken by the new chairman. (SCMP 13/6/92)
He was arrested and taken away in a car. (SCMP 3/9/92)
Active voice (reconstructed versions)
The new chairman took the decision.
The police arrested him and took him away in a car.
The differences in form between these passive and active clauses can be summarised as follows:
The main effect of the difference in voice is thus to reverse the order of the two noun groups
which represent the subject and the object in the active version. For information about
the reasons for wanting to do this, see
Using passive voice:
What is passive voice for?
It is important to note that only transitive verbs can be passivised in this way (with
a few exceptions). For further information about this, see Using passive voice: Passive voice and transitivity.
Teaching implications
Students are often asked to practise passive voice by changing active clauses into passive clauses. This may help them to master the differences in form between the two voices. However, it will not by itself teach them anything about meaning differences between active and passive voice, or help them to use passive voice appropriately in context. For this, they will need more meaningful, contextualised practice activities.